Isabel Allende

On my last two trips to South America (Colombia & Brazil), I brought an Isabel Allende novel [The House of the Spirits & Eva Luna].  Her long form descriptions and ability to transcend reality bringing her reader through a mystic journey perfectly complemented my own travels and travails. Maybe it was the headspace I was in, or the long bus rides, or just simply her talent as a writer that allowed me to escape cualquier physical space I was in at the moment, and be taken to the alternate reality she created.

Here are some of my favorite quotes from Eva Luna -House of Spirits coming soon-

pg. 8: “That is the Most Holy Virgin Mary,” the nun explained to her. “She is God?” “No, she is the Mother of God.” “Yes, but who has the say in heaven, God or his Mama?”

pg. 43: “There is no death, daughter. People only die when we forget them…If you can remember me, I will be with you always.”

pg. 53: “You’re grown up now, and I can’t keep you. You’ll have to go to work and earn your living and be strong, the way it should be,” said my madrina. I was seven years old.

pg. 70: At night she slept in her coffin, partly to become accustomed to it, to lose her fear of it, and partly to irritate the patrona, who never got used to the idea of a coffin in her house.

pg. 76: He even wrote a letter to the Ministry of Trade, suggesting the possibility of towing an iceberg from the polar zone, crushing i, and scattering it from airplanes to see whether it might change the climate and combat the laziness of his country men.

pg. 141: …but many had no way to pay because only rarely did they have money in hand. They were, in fact, suspicious of the paper money that today was worth something and tomorrow might be withdrawn from circulation, according to the whim of the current leader, printer paper that could vanish if you turned your back–as did happen with the collection for Aid to Lepers, devoured by a goat that ambled into the treasurer’s office.

pg. 164: I believed I had become truly invisible.

pg. 173: Rolf Carle began working with señor Aravena the same month the Russians launched a space capsule containing a dog. Rolf’s Uncle Rupert was infuriated when he heard the news: “That’s the Soviets for you, they don’t even respect animals!”

pg. 187: “As I approached my seventeeth year, I grew to my full height and my face became the face I have today. I stopped examining myself in the mirror to compare myself to the perfect beauties of the movies and magazines; I decided I was beautiful–for the simple reason I wanted to be….

I began to wonder if anything truly existed, whether reality wasn’t an unformed and gelatinous substance only half-captured by my senses. There was no proof that everyone perceived it in the same way; maybe Zulema and Riad, Halabi and others had a different impression of things; maybe they did not see the same colors or hear the same sounds I did. If that were true, each of us was living in absolute isolation. The thought terrified me..

pg. 203: It took a constant effort of imagination to fill in the parts of my past that were missing. Even my mother was an ephemeral shadow I had to sketch clearly in my mind each day if I was not to lose her in the labyrinths of memory.

pg. 214: …although she was a vegetarian, she ate like a rabbit.

pg. 281:…then sell me a past, because mine is filled with blood and lamentation, and I cannot use it in my way through life.

The other component I found out about half way through the House of the Spirits is that everything she wrote was deeply rooted in political history and representative of a time of serious unrest within Chile. Choose to read into the history of these battles and the experience reading her novels may be that much more enriched; I have not, but plan to do so then reread the novels in Spanish… 🙂

booklists

this is a list I’ve compiled over the years; one day I will get around to reading them all :


 

Ulysses by James Joyce

Foucault’s Pendulum by Umberto Eco

A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson

Gould’s Book of Fish by Richard Flanagan

Oscar and Lucinda by Peter Carey

History of the World in 10 1/2 Chapters by Julian Barnes

Orxy and Crake by Margaret Atwood [have read many of her poems, great author]

Midnight’s Children by Salman Rushdle

One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia Marquez [have read many of his short stories / also recommend Love in the Time of Cholera]

Cold Comfort Farm by Stella Gibbons

Three Men in a Boat and Idle Thoughts of an Idle Fellow by Jerome K. Jerome

But Enough About You and If You Can’t Live Without Me, Why Aren’t You Dead Yet? by Synthia Heimel

Nine Stories & Raise High the Rooftop Carpenters by J.D. Sallanger

The Sylvia Chronicles by Nicole Hollander

When Do They Serve the Wine? by Liza Donnelly

In God We Trust, All Others Pay Cash and Wanda Hickey’s Night of Golden Memories by Jean Shepard

Lolita by Vladmir Nabokov

The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka

Slaughterhouse-five by Kurt Vonnegut

Tropic of Cancer by Henry Miller

American Psycho by Brett Easton Ellis

Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe [have read – recommended]

Heart of Darkness–response to ^^

The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chobsky

The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck [have read and seen Of Mice and Men]

The Satanic Verses by Salman Rushdie

Brave New World by Aldouss Huxley

Notes from underground (Russian)

Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller  [have read The Crucible]

Books by Gore Vidal

A LIST OF BOOKS RECOMMENDED BY PROFESSORS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS IN AUSTIN


Books read in last 8 months:

The Elegance of the Hedgehog by Muriel Barbery (could read over and over again) 

Leaks by Susan Mrosek

When You Are Engulfed in Flames // Dress Your Family in Corduroy // Squirrel Seeks Chipmunk by David Sedaris

The Environmental History of the United States by Mark Fiege

Hunters and Bureaucrats by David Nadasdy

Uncommon Ground by William Cronon

The Idealist by Nina Munk (for perspectives on International Development)

Elizabeth Costello by J.M. Coetzee

5 Ways to Save the Planet (in your spare time) by Gregory Schwartz

Quick Read – worth your time

In about 2 hours I sat down and read “5 Ways to Save the Planet (in your spare time).” This book was written by the doctoral student, Gregory Schwartz, whom I will be working with this summer, and definitely worth your time. I do have some points of contention which I will explore in a later post, but you can buy it here and check out our department here.

Some ideas to think about:

Flying vs. Sailing

How to reduce energy use in time efficient and practical ways?

The EV1 – Who Killed the Electric Car?

Sex Trade of Costa Rica — types of travelers?

Fast Food Beef Industy — Burger King leaving Central America?

Problems with GEM and GDI indicators…

Ethical/Moral Qualms with Horseback riding…

Further Investigate Agent Orange

Ideologies that Giving Money is an answer…

Need to obtain his writings on Thai women…

All should read Elizabeth Costello by J.M. Coetzee and watch Symphony of Soil and read Uncommon Ground (actually can pick and chose the articles you want to read…I did not like them all)

More Research needs to be done on vaccinations for myself

Still feeling hopeless about Costa Rica’s energy market and future development.

 

Monkey Wrench Gang

 Compare the larger points that you see Edward Abbey trying to make with the main themes in this course: Then, add your own assessment: In what ways, if any, are their concerns still relevant?

 

In The Monkey Wrench Gang, Edward Abbey explicitly, yet humorously, attacks the political, social, and natural environment of America in the 70s. Through a ragtag group of characters he questions how we interact with the built environment, and through their story also questions exploration before knowing the consequences. Lastly, through deliberate word choice he anthropomorphizes the environment and speaks to a larger debate of the sentience of typically non-sentient beings in our natural world.

 

In this class, we have questioned if humans of the last several centuries have existed within the natural environment or are actually now existing in a separate sphere in our own built environment. Abbey addresses this issue and emphasizes the material embodiments of mankind, such as dams or fences, which present clear, and controversial, interactions of man with the natural world. These physical manifestations unambiguously purely serve humans and “cut off [animals] escape from blizzard and drought”, or ability traverse the landscape or waterways (Abbey, 156).  As humans are now able to connect globally to nearly every space on the planet, we have limited the ability of other species to do so. The emotional and physical hurdles to simply destroy these barriers are evident, but we have to ask whom this planet exists to serve?

 

One of the major problems with asking the prior question is that sometimes do not know the repercussions of our actions before we execute the action. Doc Sarvis simply asks “If constructive vandalism turns destructive, what then? Perhaps we’ll be doing more harm than good” (Abbey, 112). Many of our readings have addressed the policies that are now in place to protect humans from being at the whim of scientists who are “curious” and need to “experiment” to see the effects of radioactive matter for example, but what if our entire relationship and development of our society is a big experiment? Our agriculture food industry is an experiment; our resource extraction is an experiment—the use of rapidly developing technologies, unfortunately, are at times without regulation until it is “too late” because we simply did not know the consequences as we “experiment”. We are now testing theories to improve our interactions with the atmosphere, but we do not know the results, and I do not know if we ever will.

 

As we work towards smoother coexistence of humans with animals and their natural environment, many would argue this does not necessarily indicate the sentience we believe those beings to have. However, throughout The Monkey Wrench Gang, there are many references to non-human beings having feelings. For example, “they were in the woods, among the friendly trees,” where he makes the deliberate choice to use “friendly” trees (254). I think this speaks to a larger conversation about how we interact with and think about the natural environment, is it living, is it responding, does it have feelings? Are humans’ feelings and needs greater than that of other living beings? I don’t know if we have come to an answer, but Abbey deliberately asserts adjectives throughout the book that imply they do.

 

Working in harmony with the environment so that all species can thrive is imperative, but it is hard to agree on how to execute this concept. What are we willing to sacrifice, blindly or consciously, for our needs? Abbey takes an extreme perspective through his characters destructing the built environment, and realizing they do not actually know the outcomes and effects that these experiences have personally or to the larger society. This can be extended to how we as a society are progressing and developing. He argues we must recognize the value and personality of the environment, and I am not sure if we, in America, have come to terms with the implications of that statement.